Wouldn’t it make more sense to describe it more as packets? Or banknotes itself in a way which gets passed from one person to another person who trust each other. Speaking of trust. I don’t know if it’s that binary. 0 or 1. I don’t 1 or 1 trust someone. I trust my wife more than a friend or some college. But then you probably also model it after the network. But for me personally. Yeah, the network of trust certainly matters. But there are red flags you can pick up that makes you trust one person less than others. Plus, I don’t want to risk my part getting drained just because I gave someone a chance. So, you may end up people only really letting someone in when they REALLY trust them. You know what I mean? So, you are not really incentivizing to give someone a chance. On the other hand, you probably should rather then build the trust relationship on economical interactions first. Let the system do the routing for you and then, after multiple exchanges, trust someone. On the other hand, you have handing out those trust relationships quite easily and it seems to quite a lot of people. Can I see the trust swaps somewhere? There are some CRC swaps I see in descreener. Are those the trust swaps. So, we end up with multiple trust swaps eventually. Jesus, how does that work? Fascinating. Okay. So, if I wanted to have eYuan, I wouldn’t even have to go over EURe. All I have to get someone into a Circles group as well. Ohhh gosh, you are really not making it easy to understand. Not to mention. Where does the Gachapon machine come into play. And paying the licnese back to the user. I need to think about this. Maybe talk to someone in person I guess. lol
I did a video trying to explain my issues with it. Also, wealth distribution. Wouldn’t you just bring the same wealth distribution into the system? So, it’s not really changing anything in that regard, is it?
In short, couldn’t you just say it works kind of like Hawala?