Proposals: GIP 112: Should the Gnosis Infrastructure team make changes to the GnosisDAO’s Snapshot configurations?
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it updating the Snapshot configurations to accurately reflect locked/staked GNO for voting, addresses known subgraph indexing issues, and enables weighted choice voting—all of which enhance fairness and reliability in the GnosisDAO’s governance process.
Proposals: GIP-114: Should GnosisDAO support an annual renewal for Blockscout SLA and hosting services - October 2024 - October 2025?
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it sustains Blockscout’s proven, open-source explorer services that are vital for both Gnosis mainnet and the Chiado testnet. The proposed renewal comes with a 20% discount on hosting, a detailed feature roadmap, and a strong SLA to ensure continuity and reliability for Gnosis developers and users.
Proposals: GIP-115: Safe{Boost} on Gnosis Chain
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it uses targeted incentives to increase Safe usage on Gnosis Chain without requiring new funds, leverages actual transaction data to guide improvements, and helps expand both ecosystems. The planned six-month duration and metrics-driven approach also provide a structured way to assess real-world impact and refine future initiatives.
Proposals: GIP-116: Should the DAO perform the following treasury operations?
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it facilitates the management of the GnosisDAO treasury by executing essential operations such as claiming and burning vested GNO, reallocating assets, and establishing the delegates.gnosis.eth subdomain.
Proposals: GIP-119: Should Gnosis fund DeSciWorld on Gnosis?
Vote: Against
We voted against this proposal because the $150,000 funding lacks sufficient evidence of high-quality DeSci projects ready to deploy on Gnosis Chain, and the proposal does not provide enough detailed information or testimonials to ensure effective and meaningful outcomes. These concerns raise doubts about the feasibility and strategic alignment of the initiative.
Proposals: GIP-117: Strategic Partnership with Backed through Liquidity Incentives on Gnosis Chain
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it would enhance Gnosis Chain’s unique offerings, attract more users through attractive yields, and strengthen the strategic partnership. This initiative promotes diversification and growth within our DeFi ecosystem, supporting Gnosis Chain to become a platform for RWAs.
Proposals: GIP-120(revised): Should GnosisDAO acquire Headquarters (HQ.xyz) to Accelerate Gnosis 3.0
Vote: For
We support this proposal because acquiring Headquarters (HQ.xyz) will enhance GnosisDAO’s global presence, especially in Asia, and accelerate the development of Gnosis 3.0 by providing essential business infrastructure for initiatives like Gnosis Pay. The acquisition terms, including token vesting and discounted investment options for investors, ensure alignment of interests and long-term value for the GNO token. Additionally, the focus on key metrics and milestones will effectively measure user growth and ecosystem integrations, strengthening the overall Gnosis ecosystem.
Proposals: Re-do of: GIP 116: Should the DAO perform the following treasury operations?
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it facilitates the management of the GnosisDAO treasury by executing essential operations such as claiming and burning vested GNO, reallocating assets, and establishing the delegates.gnosis.eth subdomain.
Proposals: GIP-118: Should sDAI be replaced by sUSDS in the bridge?
Vote: For
We support this proposal because it boosts user returns by switching to sUSDS, which benefits from a higher Sky Savings Rate compared to sDAI, and aligns with MakerDAO’s move toward USDS—keeping Gnosis Chain ahead in an evolving DeFi landscape. This proposal not only enhances yield opportunities and future-proofs our platform but also comes with robust technical safeguards like thorough audits and testnet testing to manage risks effectively.
Proposals: GIP-121: Should GnosisDAO accept a combined total of 7.5% ownership for incubating karpatkey DAO?
Vote: For
We supports this proposal, which increases Gnosis DAO stake in karpatkey DAO to 7.5%, to strengthen the DAO strategic alignment with a leading treasury management service we incubated. Since 2021, karpatkey has adeptly managed over $2 billion in assets across 10,000+ transactions without any losses, demonstrating exceptional financial stewardship. This enhanced partnership ensures GnosisDAO’s continued influence in karpatkey’s expanding network, fostering ongoing collaboration within our ecosystem.
Proposals: GIP-122: Should GnosisDAO support the continued development of Gnosis VPN to bring it to market?
Vote: For
We supports this proposal to continue the development of Gnosis VPN. We recognized its potential to deliver a decentralized, trustless, and censorship-resistant VPN solution aligned with Gnosis ecosystem’s goals. The initial proof-of-concept significantly exceeded expectations, demonstrating technical viability and the strong capability of the HOPR team. By investing $4.8M and allocating additional incentives to onboard node operators, we back a clear, structured roadmap transitioning from a minimal viable product to a fully market-ready solution for widespread adoption. This strategic initiative advances GnosisDAO’s commitment to privacy, decentralization, and secure, uncensorable communication for users globally.