We have performed basic due diligence on this updated proposal and payload, to understand the differences and reason for the proposal resubmission.
It appears to us that the re-do will utilise automated execution to immediately trigger the payload, where the previous proposal relied on the multisig signers to execute this manually. We’re satisfied that this is a reasonable cause to re-do the proposal, if needed to progress execution.
We note that the order of operations in the payload has been altered, but that the content is effectively the same. Claimable token balances for the accrued COW and GNO tokens have increased as expected, and the stETH balance has also rebased (i.e. increased) as expected.
Where there are any further changes to flag, or issues with our analysis, we would be grateful for further confirmation of those points. Otherwise, on the basis of our analysis, we’re happy to again support this resubmitted proposal.