Please could the team clarify the approach to payment for this proposal? Is payment in GNO, stables or otherwise? And are phases paid out only after the milestones are met? Are payments made in full, or vested?
As per our comment on GIP-123, we are uncertain of whether now is the right time to be building additional dashboards, whilst participation is still so low (and therefore easy to follow) and GIP-101 hasn’t yet had any substantive effects.
We would also be interested to hear from @AakashPYOR and @vivekkumar on the link between GIP-123 and GIP-124, which covers similar data gathering exercises to boost governance initiatives. Are the two straight alternatives? Could these efforts be joined? And given we already have examples of Curia’s work, what feedback would you provide on their proposed efforts, to maximise the efficiency of dashboard workstreams for GnosisDAO?
Given that this proposal failed the initial temp check in Phase 2, we would propose that our feedback is considered and incorporated, before resubmitting for another Phase 2 vote. We would ideally like to see GIP-123 and GIP-124 handled together, and all efforts made to minimise duplication and maximise value for the DAO. As it stands, we certainly will not support two similar governance dashboard initiatives at the same time!
Thank you