The governance forum for GnosisDAO and the Gnosis ecosystem — propose and
debate Gnosis Improvement Proposals (GIPs), follow treasury and delegate
updates, and help shape what comes next.
Navigating these manual bureaucratic hoops with zero steward guidance, and getting contradictory signals on whether to silent-edit or post new replies, is quite the obstacle course. Maybe GnosisDAO should deploy an AI governance assistant to flag procedural steps in real time, given how absent human moderation is until a proposal hits Phase 3.
Fair point, I did miss that reply. To be totally honest, it’s been pretty tough to keep track of everything you posted in July (I counted 43 replies and 2 new topics on the forum alone). If you felt stuck or unsupported, you could have easily pinged me directly, just like you do on Discord for other things.
As for the voting process: up to you, but if we treat that poll from three weeks ago as your official phase 2 vote, then we also have to follow the rest of the rules : because it didn’t reach the minimum threshold of 10 votes to advance to phase 3, the proposal ultimately doesn’t even pass phase 2.
In DAO governance, a lack of participation is often a signal in itself. When a proposal sits for weeks with almost zero engagement, it usually means the community isn’t aligned with it or prioritizing it right now. For now, it might be best to let this rest. If community priorities shift down the road, or if organic interest naturally builds, it can always be revisited.