GIP-77: Should the GnosisDAO add delegation & spam reduction?

[Sisyphos]

Thanks for posting this @auryn_macmillan, and to the team that worked on it!

@auryn_macmillan

Add some trusted moderators that have the ability to remove posts that they deem to be low-quality. (new)

This could be clear for most of all who have been looking at the snapshot space recently, but some examples or general guidelines may help interpret it. E.g. low quality means the GIP is not following the GIP template GIP-0: Template.

Are moderators going to be known, e.g. information added to the space bio, for people to reach out if they are looking for feedback?

@auryn_macmillan

• Allow delegates to optionally set a cap on the amount of vote weight delegated to them.

I was wondering if a cap on max delegation would help in:

• Create some additional friction for people that have enough vote power to guarantee quorum
• Avoid the perception that participating in snapshot voting may be pointless when one wallet is seen to provide quorum and make a decision.

It is granted that such a user could still delegate to more than one wallet in their control. But I thought it may be worth the time considering those two bullets if the effort to implement it is reasonable.

Cheers!