Should GnosisDAO respond to the Hundred Finance exploit in the following manner?

[Wunderbernd]

I already mentioned some reasons in the Agave thread why I think the DAO should reimburse the users:

Should Gnosis Help Reimburse Some of The Lost Funds on Agave

I also support the proposal. We should always put the long term success of the chain before the short term. Here are my reasons why a reimbursment will help the long term success of the chain: A lot of the effected users are early adopters/ long time supporters of the ecosystem. If we don’t support these people this might hurt the long term growth of the chain. It is crucial for the success of the ecosystem to have core users. Gnosis DAO was willing to spend 200 mil in ecosystem rewards. I…

I think this proposal is very eligant and it would benefit all the parts involved:

1. The DAO is willing to spend 200 m for ecosystem rewards, in the recent Uniswap V3 proposal Gnosis chain offered 10 m in liquidity rewards. The DAO can count this as a part of the ecosystem reward campaign

2. The proposal enforces long term commitment to the chain and the protocol, the tokens are vested and we won’t have initial sell pressure on the tokens. The users also have a direct interest in the success of the chain and the protocol, because a price increase also benefits them directly. My guess is that even after the vesting period is over, the vast majority won’t sell their tokens, they will just keep them in the protocol and borrow against them.