Proposals: GIP-102: Should GnosisDAO provide financing for the new GnosisVC ecosystem venture fund?
Vote: For
Rationale: We support this proposal as it aligns with GnosisDAO’s mission to foster ecosystem growth by financing the GnosisVC fund. This investment will leverage $20m from GnosisDAO, matched by $20m from external LPs, to fuel early-stage projects within the focused growing verticals of RWAs, decentralized infrastructure, and financial payment rails. By integrating and incubating these ventures, the proposal aims to drive innovation, adoption, and synergies within the Gnosis ecosystem, ultimately enhancing its value and impact.
Vote: For
Rationale: We support this proposed marketing campaign because we believe it will significantly boost awareness and adoption of the Shutterized Gnosis Chain, emphasizing its unique benefits like protection against malicious MEV and censorship. With a comprehensive plan that includes PR efforts and community engagement at major events, we can ensure a successful launch, attract more users, and enhance the overall ecosystem of Gnosis Chain.
Proposals: GIP-105: Should GnosisDAO support v2 Gnosischa.in Explorer hosted by beaconcha.in?
Vote: Against
Rationale: We support the enhanced features and improvements outlined in the proposal for the Gnosischa.in Explorer. However, we voted against the proposal due to the additional $100,000 integration fee, which we believe is unnecessary for a continuation of the existing service. We will vote in favor of the proposal once this fee is removed.