I don’t understand how this is measured here. Ofc the delegates will vote, and have more voting power, but otherwise it didn’t change much as I see it.
Can absolutely agree on this and I am missing especially the involvement of the large holders. Imho delegate some voting rights to ppl interested is fine, but still I would favor to see more participation in the discussion and votig process by those, having a larger stake in gnosis (@mkoeppelmann is one of the few exceptions).
And last but not least: Posting and discussing more internals here regarding the shaping of the gc-ecosystem would for sure attract more ppl to join. This regards many topics @Karpatkey (maybe with advice from some internals) is deciding on it’s own right now like 1.) where to put or remove liquidity, 2.) how to use voting rights in other protocols like balancer and curve and 3.) last but not least the buybacks that have been done (see post from @Nay 1 ).
I am very interested if you see a way to become more open about these topics, cause imho its as important as this GIP on the way to become a real DAO that attracts others to join