GIP-119: Should Gnosis fund DeSciWorld on Gnosis?

Governance GIPs
1

GIP-119: Should Gnosis fund DeSciWorld on Gnosis?

  • In Favour
  • Against
0 voters 
GIP: 119
title: Should Gnosis fund DeSciWorld on Gnosis?
author: Joshua Bate (TG: @JBate7, joshua@desci.world)
status: Draft
type: Funding
created: 2024-12-10
duration: Jan 1 - March 31 (Q1)
funding: 150,000 USDC

Category

Funding - Rewards/Reimbursement [Grants Programme, DeSci Infrastructure]

Executive Summary:

The creation of a quarter-long grants programme to incentivise early stage DeSci projects to deploy on Gnosis Chain. DeSci is a vertical that Gnosis has long supported, yet did not yet have the traction or product to justify efforts from the Gnosis Foundation. DeSci can facilitate novel use of the blockchain, bringing highly professional teams and researchers to the space, whilst improving outcomes for science and scientists. Gnosis has a keen interest in supporting this narrative. To begin with, the grants programme will be facilitated by the DeSciWorld team.

Specification

The technical specification is divided into two sections: prerequisite and desired.

The prerequisite technology will be simple DAO tooling such as Safe and Snapshot, to help organise each project and distribute funding in a secure and decentralized manner. We will utilise tools such as Charmverse for the submission of grant applications.

Desired:
The scope of the grants programme will be to facilitate the creation of novel protocols for DeSci projects to utilise as foundational tools. We will put a call to action for tools such as funding mechanisms, publishing protocols and collective research tools. The exact specifications for this are not possible to record, except the intention with calls for projects being to facilitate the above tooling creation.

Rationale

It is important to utilise robust and well tested tools for the facilitation of the grants programme. This saves on risk factors, time and money.

For DeSci as a vertical to succeed on Gnosis Chain, we should seek to create foundational tools for onchain researchers to utilise. Tools that facilitate the recording of verifiable data, permissionless “multiplayer” access to the research tasks, collective funding with milestone unlocks and more should be developed to correctly onboard more science to Gnosis.

Budget

Total: $150,000

Reserved for grantees: $135,000

Reserved for DeSciWorld grants committee: $15,000 ($5000/m)

Milestones:

Proposed timeline: 3 months
Final deliverable: Reaching the March 31st date with full allocation of grant fund to DeSci projects deployed on Gnosis.

Timeline, Implementations and Deliverable
Milestone 1 - Deployment of the grants application process
Deliverables - An extensive and transparent grants application
Time and Price Estimate - By January 31st, $5000 unlock from the team budget

Milestone 2 - Funding of 1 project
Deliverables - The first project to be accepted and funded
Time and Price Estimate - <$40,000 to be unlocked for the first project, as required

Milestone 3 - Funding of 2 further projects
Deliverables - The second and third projects to be accepted and funded
Time and Price Estimate - <$60,000 to be unlocked for these projects, as required

Milestone 4 - Funding of any further projects
Deliverables - Any further projects to be accepted and funded
Time and Price Estimate - >$35,000 to be unlocked for all remaining qualified projects

Evaluation
Number of Projects onboarded: (deployed code or funds on Gnosis Chain with a specific function of DeSci)
Number of “scientists” with a Gnosis Chain wallet: (“scientists” either publicly verified or anonymous but with a form of zK verification)
Users of the grant programme dApps and tools:
Funds allocated to DeSci projects through the grant programme projects:
Average score of temperature check across the Q1 programme: (as determined by the Gnosis Community vote)

Team/ Organization

DeSciWorld is proposing to lead the “DeSci on Gnosis” programme for the first iteration, in Q1, with the support of the Gnosis community. After the conclusion of this programme, a repeat GIP will be posted. If this first effort is successful, we anticipate support from the DevRel team at Gnosis and resources to be offered from Gnosis.

DeSciWorld has seeded a number of global DeSci communities, onboarded hundreds of people and built a trusted brand since October 2021.

Team from DeSciWorld:
Joshua Bate - Founder
Carolina Menchaca - Scientist Relations
Dr Jelani Clarke - CBDO
Marcus Khoo - Scholarship programme creator
(many others in the team involved in development and marketing, but not listed here)

Conclusion

DeSci is a growing and important vertical for the Ethereum ecosystem. It can bring transactions, funding, attention and prestige to this community and Gnosis has a strong alignment both intellectually and ethically with this movement - the name Gnosis alone is rather poetic. It is our strong conviction that funding DeSci on Gnosis would benefit token holders, the Gnosis ecosystem and the GnosisDAO strategically over the long term due to the increased usage of Gnosis Chain, coupled with the liquidity seeking scientific usecases, and finally the strong network effects of being directly invovled with academics and institutional users.

Gnosis Snapshot

Phase 2 Proposals: Please ignore this section, and leave as is. It is used for Phase 3 proposals.
Phase 3 Proposals: Add a link to the corresponding Gnosis Snapshot poll you’ve created.

2

Thanks for your proposal. We had a few questions that we would appreciate your input on, to help inform our view on the proposal:

  1. What credentials do the DeSciWorld team have to execute on this plan? How many projects have been seeded precisely, and what value of funding has been provided? The dashboard suggests 6 or so external projects to date. It would be helpful to have a sense of what the most successful ones have achieved. And what scientific areas you have particular expertise and connections to?

  2. Please could you elaborate on the legal basis of the funding? Specifically, is the grant funding “no strings attached”? Do you envisage options to take some ownership stake in the process? Or if not, what keeps the projects from exhausting the funding and then leaving? And what incentive alignment would there be between the projects and the Gnosis ecosystem (beyond the shared interests in decentralization and science you mention in the post)? You mention the benefits of activity, liquidity and network effects for Gnosis, but what ties the projects to Gnosis?

  3. The Gnosis ecosystem already encapsulates a wide range of incubated and supported projects, that feed into the core Gnosis community. GnosisVC is also taking shape. Do you have thoughts on how these separate funding/incubation schemes would work together? And if Gnosis were to fund DeSci projects, why should it do that through DeSciWorld rather than through its existing methods?

  4. What safeguards would there be to ensure that DeSciWorld and the funded projects are operating as they should? Would Gnosis have oversight over the funding decisions, and insight into the project’s processes? Would there be the ability to halt or clawback funding if not being used properly?

Thanks in advance :pray:

2 Likes
3

Hey, thanks for your questions:

  1. “seeding” was the wrong choice of word. DeSciWorld’s impact towards projects was mostly non-pecuniary, instead we showed support in co-organising events, collaborating on products, creating partnerships and alliances with our network and helping to signal boost through our trusted platform. There were many sponsorships, prizes and grants funded from our treasury, although altogether totalling <$20k. Our most successful projects (events) include: DeSci Day at Aleph, DeSci Istanbul at Devconnect and NERD Labs Hacker House.

Our team is well versed and connected across much of scence and academia: biotech, marine biology and conservation, neuro, AI, space; universities, research organisations, open science communities and more. Many in our team are qualified scientists and work alongside academia today. Our team has also spent our collective decades in web3 utilising and interacting with grant protocols, governance and onchain communities.

Our best credentials are the trust shown to us by the DeSci community and our experience with early stage projects and founders.

  1. I am aware Gnosis uses a method called “convertable grants” in which grants are converted to equity at first round price should a project decide to launch a product with token/equity. This is a great solution to a problem that plagues foundations - would be very happy to adopt it. The incentive alignment I believe will develop as a result of network effects of bringing DeSci projects to Gnosis. If enough high quality projects are launched here, it becomes a Hub. I see Gnosis as the foremost runner for that “DeSci Hub”, as it has appropriate tech (low cost, high tp, security and decentralisation) for the task, yet has additional features such as yield bearing DAI natively, a budding agent ecosystem and, most importantly, the high ethical standards of Gnosis and the culture of its community are crucial to stewarding good onchain science. “They came for the tech and stayed for the vibes!”

  2. I would imagine the grants would function as above, and constitute a small early investment. It makes good sense to me that GnosisVC would come in to help scale the most promising projects into fully fledged protocols and take equity in the process. Gnosis should absolutely fund DeSci projects of its own volition and we hope it does so. DeSciWorld has offered to handle this programme for Q1 as we believe time is of the essence and we are at a turning point in DeSci’s growth cycle. If we wait for some months to begin this effort, it might not be as optimal. We have the drive and team to execute on this immediately, so offered ourselves to run this as a partnership. How far and deep that partnership goes is another discussion entirely, but lets first get this work done well.

  3. We will operate this programme to high standards throughout using best industry practise with regards to reporting, handling funds, identity solutions where required, transparency and efficiency of operations. Gnosis is invited to be as closely involved in the process as possible. Clawback of funding is possible but messy; we would prefer to issue milestone unlocks to mitigate these concerns. However, we could include some clauses if needed.

Hope these helped!

2 Likes
4

We really appreciate the swift and detailed responses - thank you. Your comments are very helpful, and it’s great that DeSciWorld has an open mind to some additions that can help to secure the value for Gnosis, like convertible grants and close involvement from Gnosis contributors.

For us, there are still a few flags here which leave us with doubts:

  • The total value handled to date is an order of magnitude less than what is being asked for. It’s hard to have confidence that there are that many high quality projects out there looking for Web 3.0 funding that DeSciWorld can bring to Gnosis Chain in the course of the next few months.

  • The cited “most successful” DeSciWorld projects so far are all DeSci events, rather than core scientific research and discovery, or the “foundational tools” described in the initial post. Though events are very important, there seems to be a wide gap between what’s been done to date and what’s being proposed for imminent action, which makes us doubt the feasibility of what’s being proposed. If there are candidate projects already in mind, it may be helpful to see details at this stage where possible.

  • The best credentials to date being the trust shown so far and experience with early stage projects and founders. Given the relatively low value and narrow direction to date shared in the previous post, we don’t attach a huge amount of weight to these credentials. Without more detail and testimonials, it’s hard to see this as more than a “trust me, bro”. But we would be keen to review more supporting information, if it’s available.

  • Likewise, the written confirmation of operating the programme “to high standards throughout using best industry practices” sounds nice, but again amounts to little more than a “trust me, bro”.

  • The belief that incentive alignment will emerge as a result of network effects feel hopeful. Network effects by their very nature start at zero and are very weak at first, but get exponentially stronger as they scale . Long term, this effect could be plausible. But in the window of a few months, we’re doubtful that a sufficient network will form across 3-6 grants to retain those efforts after the funding dries up. If I were a rival Web 3.0 ecosystem with grant money to spend, I wouldn’t hesitate to go after DeSci projects that were seeded by Gnosis. We’ve seen similar elsewhere in the industry, like with zkSync poaching Treasure DAO and Lens.

  • The appeals to “time is of the essence” and “if we wait… it might not be as optimal” feel a bit like pressure selling and panic investing. We agree that if Gnosis wants to establish an early lead in DeSci that there is no time like the present to get started. But we don’t think that panic or FOMO are ever a sound basis for sound funding or investing decisions. And, if Gnosis is to step up involvement in DeSci, there needs to be discussions about allocating resources internally to support a program like this over the long term, and that all takes time.

Putting aside the specific details of this proposal, we also have a recent scathing criticism of DeSci from Tarun Chitra burning in our ears. In essence, he complains that most DeSci projects today come from low quality applicants who have struggled to receive funding elsewhere, and hope to appeal to the mindless-but-fast money in Web 3.0 to progress their own careers. Though we don’t take that view firmly here, we’re mindful of the risk with this proposal. At present, there’s not enough information to say definitively that this initiative can find and support high-quality projects (or to rule out it being a ploy for mindless-but-fast money).

Finally, we should say that we’re not completely against this proposal, but feel at the present time that the available information isn’t sufficiently persuasive for us to vote in favour. We’re open to receiving more information to consider, and mean no disrespect with our critical feedback. We would also love to see DeSci flourish within the Gnosis Ecosystem for the right reasons!

5

Hey again,

Before addressing each individual point, I want to make it clear that DeSciWorld is very aware that running a grants programme has its own unique challenges: handling funds for others, facilitating applications, reviews and evaluations with all the required follow-up for a successful long-term integration with Gnosis. We are aware that our prior experience does not equate to experience here and that there is a learning curve to executing this.

Further, we are offering our services here because we are motivated and capable, plus we have a good network to fill the first grants round with great projects. We came to the discussion originally with Gnosis to say “lets do something together”, in the end the discussions conlcuded with “we like the idea, go ahead and try in Q1 then we can support later if it works.” I want it to be clear that this is a collective effort and will need everyone to succeed in the long term.

Having said that, I know you’re doing careful DD and this is exactly one of the reasons I approached Gnosis in the first place - the rigour. The money offered by Gnosis in this programme is not the reason we are here. In fact, we have been offered literally 50x the cash available to facilitate a grants programme with other new chains seeking to bring DeSci there. I turned these down as I have always hoped to make something work here with Gnosis. The 150k ask is just an essential minimum to attract early builders; if there are chains offering 10x, why would a project choose Gnosis, if there are zero funds available for them here?

  1. Correct, the amount we have distributed before is less than asked for here. However DeSciWorld is not a grants foundation, we are a company building tools and a technical product, we gave that money out to help build the ecosystem and we have done so at our own expense. We had very little money over the last 3.5 years, especially compared to some other DeSci projects, yet we did more to help the grassroots ecosystem than most. This is a testiment to us, not against us. Not all projects had funding. Given our acitivites, we have developed a strong network and reputation, as such we have a strong pipeline of the highest quality DeSci projects that would happily deploy on Gnosis if we spin this programme up. I have already briefed 3 and they said “absolutely”.

  2. Again, it would be unfair to assume work done in a bear market with no resources available are representative of what is possible and what we want to build.

From our side, our original whitepaper in 2021 details a number of these foundational tools which we sadly could not build due to lack of funding and popular interest (Gnosis itself opened and closed a DeSci programme in 2022, despite their resources). We are now 2 years into development of a shared knowledge layer for AI agents called Proof of Knowledge which goes live early next year. I have already briefed Martin on this as a collaboration potential, and am waiting to hear back.

Candidate Proposals:

  • collective research toolkit (researcher friendly UX for collaborative research, sharing files, storing funds, making proposals, grading contributions, displaying information in dashboards, collaborating with other teams - to be open sourced)
  • funding and management tool for IRL experimentation (a model that will be applied to this project’s specific usecases. If they make it a public good, then available to all, otherwise will become an investment partner through convertible grants)
  • prediction markets for research
  • gamified bacterial growth project, for irl cultivating of high quality microbial genetic lines.

  1. DeSci is a relatively small and nascent field so its not surprising that you’re not so aware of our work but within the DeSci space you will find countless testimonials from projects and founders of all types of projects as to the ability, trustworthiness and dedication of our team regarding a variety of tasks and initiatives. Events was just the thing we excelled at and saw the most value derived from. It would be unfair to assume inability to carry out this programme based on our previous good work being in other fields. Happy to share referrals to you! We have also built desci.world, and are soon to release Proof of Knowledge, a highly technical product with 6 full time developers building it. I can share the background of the team and advisory board but just for brevity:
    Team: 3 x PhDs, 1 x MD, collective 35 years development experience, audited by Trail of Bits and Chainsecurity twice, funded by a16z, worked at Avalanche, AminoChain, Intuition Systems, Vans, Ford, Harvest Finance ++);
    Advisory: Eugene Leventhal (imo, web3’s most accomplished grants and governance builder), co-founder of Pi Network, ex-1kx and Delphi research, director of SETI Institute,

  2. I mentioned a few of the standards we would apply in the original proposal but happy to share a full plan.

  3. I agree and we are not naive to this. However, DeSciWorld has already its own 3.5year network effect in play. Which is why we believe we are uniquely situated to make a 0-something movement happen on a chain. If we (us and Gnosis) do our work correctly, the projects should have some self-sustaining mechanisms and the Gnosis Fund should be interested to further fund more projects.

There are rival web3 ecosystems planning DeSci funds of deca-millions, “trust me”, and Gnosis has no interest to compete on money with those chains. It requires a different approach. That approach should be: high quality community and participation, wider ecosystem support and interest, professional team and support, ethical alignment and a feeling of belonging to something exciting and growing. “Big Foundation” will just bankroll everything like they did last cycle and those chains will see the same momentary traction that fails. We dont want this. It is also implausible to assume projects that deploy to Gnosis will stay only on Gnosis, thats not the design of the multichain space we are in. If they are successful, by design they should port to other chains also. It is just about ensuring the core growth is associated with Gnosis, that the project feels most at home there and the foundational tools are built on Gnosis so the full suite is available here, rather than piecemeal on other chains, which would be the result if this programme here is successful.

The alternative is to a) ask projects for chain exclusivity, or b) not do the programme at all. I would say neither of these is a good idea.

  1. I knew when writing that sentence that your response would be that you felt pressured. I understand but thats sadly a result of the battle scars we all have from scammers etc in this space. I have been building DeSciWorld for 3.5 years now. I am not rushing anything. But, trust me, this is the most optimal moment there has ever been in DeSci to do this, which is why I am proposing it now. There are already plenty prospective projects to assess and a number I would immediately engage with, but that is only going to hockey-stick grow in the next year with more funding and interest available here. We can otherwise just let the VCs and the tourists with money to take all the projects under their wing. Im not interested in a future of DeSci like that. Again, I am so absolutely aligned with Gnosis having as much involvement as possible, that is the ideal. Any support for long term planning with Gnosis is very very welcome, I want us to be considered an interim coach, getting the field warmed up for Gnosis to come and win the league as manager.

I understand your scepticism around DeSci right now. We are deeply disappointed with the behaviours of some of our colleagues in the space and, if you knew any of our team, you would know where we stand on “good standard” DeSci (https://q.org/blog/q-development-ag-unveils-strategic-alliance-with-desci-world, an initiative from over a year ago that again I struggled to find funding and collaborators for, so we shelved. Q still has a $30k grant for us that we did not touch.) This is a different time of market and the mood is entirely changed. The quality and number of participants in this space has genuinely skyrocketed, its just the most visible ones are the worst of the bunch. If you want to discuss 1 on 1 our view of the direction of DeSci then I am happy to, but I will not smear projects here in the comments. However, it is disheartening to hear that you are unaware if this is a quick cash grab or not. I fight back my annoyance in this post but, if we wanted money from chains, we would not ask for 150k and the job of facilitating the entire programme ourselves, for 5k/m. There are many dozens of times more funds avaiable elsewhere.

We chose Gnosis for its reputation, ability and desire for truly decentralised change. We hope Gnosis chooses us for the same reasons.

1 Like
6

Hey, this is the tech lead @desciworld.eth

I personally come from academia and my interest in the field comes from a desire to fix the underlying issues of knowledge distribution which have a lot over downstream implications for society at large.

We have developed a system to generate detailed semantic mapping of knowledge which we intend to leverage to manage resources in a novel way which I hope will enable throughput and quality never seen before in this sort of setup.

We are creating an agent framework that enables us to coordinate knowledge generation between distributed users and plan to deploy it to automate parts of the grant development process. Gnosis multisig tech is at the heart of our solution which is why we’re interested on participating here too. Our system puts a multisig between agents and users allowing people, not AI to have the final say on decisions made by our automated process.

I agree with the statement made by Tarun, but I also think most people are missing the forest for the trees. We have been working on this specific solution since 2022, and I’ve been researching AI and Big data for a decade now.

DeSci will intersect knowledge creation, programmable value, and AI automation, unlocking the chain for a billion users interacting with it through agentic abstractions. The implications are huge since it could democratize access to structured knowledge generation and possibly change how we view science…

1 Like
7

Hi, Im writing this as a testimonial. Im a Founder at EVO Labs DAO. We are a DeSci DAO who aim to launch Q1 next year. Dev work ongoing.

I came across Joshua in a TG group focused on DeSci in London. I really liked the cut of his jib and reached out for a call to find out more.

I have been in the space for ten years now but have been volunteering in an open-source physics project focused on condensed matter and catalysed fusion for four years. Hence my curiosity in DeSci as it bridges two areas interest, crypto and science.

Josh and I spoke about the challenges within the academic sphere in relation to acquiring funding: the hubris, the greed, the gatekeeping. We discussed the meme coin bullshit and hypothesized about actual funding going to actual projects. Not just mindless gambling.

I commented that I had been privately funding a number of experimental physicists and engineers, assisting them with health and safety equipment, new power supplies etc, or with their day-to-day bills to allow them to keep working in an open-source fashion. I have also assisted with storing deceased inventors assets to ensure that future experimentation can occur and access to information isn’t lost.

After further discussion with Josh at EthCC in Brussels, followed by more meetings in Holland with experimenters, physicists, and one of the world experts in the field, the idea of forming a DAO for our 11,000 strong community was brought into being.

For the last four months we have been building a DeSci DAO for condensed matter physics and catalysed fusion focusing on incubating experimenters who are working on old patents reimagined with modern materials science or methodologies. We will also assist with project management services. Most experimenters who actually do things and don’t just write academic papers, sometimes frown upon keeping notes or logs of changes to their devices. We aim to assist them with that so others can learn from their work.

We are also going to open source everything. From funding applications to DAO rubric voting outcomes, forums discussions, including all experimental results especially failures. Everything will be bundled and stored on arweave for future generations. We are partnering with a reputable journal who will take our papers and potentially release special editions for us. Why? Because as we are open sourcing everything, we aren’t patenting anything either. If one publishes their work in a Journal, it acts as a blocker for a year which allows us to continue working in the open and without claims against us.

We are one of the projects out there looking for Web3 funding from DeSci World. When we launch in Q1 of next year, we are looking at which chain to launch our SBTs on as we aren’t doing a token at all until we generate some of revenue. We are trying to stay away as much as possible from the pumpamentals exhibited by less scrupulous members of the wider DeSci community.

Which projects are we looking to have funded? We have ten so far and have stopped taking applications prior to launch as we need to test various aspects of our gov flows. Projects for launch are: a waste disposal unit that can take wet items and without any extra heat, desiccate input materials; we have a direct matter to energy device which taps plasma for electricity; we have a flux battery which potentially can be 3d printed (1m version uses 200MW input); we have a cavitation system which apparently has a COP of 8 (marginally better than the best heat pump solutions); we have a ball lightning reactor; we are creating an open source timeline project where researchers can freely peruse hard to find patents and academic papers; we have an easy to replicate experiment (costs $300 and can be done by a child) which shows transmutation and charge cluster strikes (need a SEM to analyse); we have a number of experimenters across the globe looking at treating tap water with cavitation and ultrasonic devices to improve water qualities for crop feed; we have some extremely interesting (very, very qualified) chaps looking at recreating the Hutchinson Experiments; and finally we have an AI in alpha which will offer the ability for researchers to ask questions which cannot be answered by any other mainstream AI as the datasets we are going to feed it are hard to find and don’t really appear in any other data sets.

While I realise this could be a “trust me bro” too please feel free to reach out to me via the Form on evo-labs.io and Ill try and arrange a call asap. We are currently heads down as we have had to build something no other defi/desci community has had to do – cater to 80 year olds. Quite a lot of our members are past retirement as they realise they can freely experiment in their golden years without being shunned by academic establishments or rubbished by their peers.

We have had to design our onboarding flow to cater to OAPs as well as degens so we have had to incorporate gas and account abstraction. However, we are looking for a chain to operate on, issue our SBTs and hold our treasury, we are interested in where DeSci finds its home.

Joshua does exhibit the best practises in DeSci. The lack of pump rubbish. A careful considered approach to gaps in the market. The willingness to listen to experimenters and understand their vision. I even put our lead scientist in a chat with him and watched in astonishment as their jaws hit the deck, they actually understood the value of what we are trying to do. Even after they brought other scientists in, they couldn’t disagree with our evidence. Happy to extend this offer the anyone in the Gnosis community if you need explanations on any of the tech listed above.

While I understand your hesitancy to offer funding to DeSci World for Grants, if Gnosis don’t get their foot in the door and begin the weak network effect, DeSci on Gnosis will never snowball into something worth noting. If you are concerned about protocols getting poached, and how much time and effort you would need to expend to protect your investments, I suggest beginning internal discussions to decide if you are going support quality candidates in DeSci, at all. If they are going to happen, they need to begin in earnest as the nearest available juncture, especially if they will take time to conclude.

When I spoke to Josh at EthCC, he was the one who pitched Gnosis as a potential home. He was the one who was bullish on the wider Gnosis community seeing the value in supporting new scientific initiatives. He is also the person I go to if I want an intro to a protocol in DeSci. He is the person I go to when I don’t understand the intricacies of a DeSci offering (the Bio stuff I don’t understand or want to really – I think its mostly a scam).

While this isn’t a call to fomo, it is a call to action. There are those of us who have seen the comments of Mr Chitra, who hate memecoins or pumping stuff just for the sake of pumping, who want DeSci to be successful as it combines open source science, funding routes, and open voting on a blockchain, and we need to find a home that wants us. Hopefully Gnosis will be it. We will look at future developments with interest and hopefully when we launch next year, we will be amongst other DeSci protocols who also want to enact positive change.

2 Likes
8

Our Snapshot vote is now live!
https://snapshot.box/#/s:gnosis.eth/proposal/0x80b370075f6c988b26e828702c5a057dd8c452e561aad0431fb9a7dad27c84f0

If you have any questions, please leave them below or contact Joshua on Telegram: @JBate7

Thanks! :test_tube::owl:

9

I don’t really know much about the world of DeSci, but I’m voting for this proposal. Let’s see how it goes—looking forward to what’s next!

1 Like