GIP-133: Should Gnosis DAO extend the Gnosis Pay Cashback budget (GIP-110) by 2,000 GNO?

The cashback program is a nice incentive but I would use the GnosisPay card even without it. To be able to on/offramp without any fees and no fees when paying in foreign currencies while having all my funds on a non-custodial wallet is already reason enough to keep using it.

6 Likes

We see the program as overall successful. It supported Gnosis Pay’s growth, increased GNO holding, and brought new activity to the chain. It makes sense to continue and avoid losing momentum while competitors move fast. Still, better management is advised.

Looks like it is ‘yes’, what is the implementation timeline?

Seems like a great idea to me.

I am voting in favour of the extension with the understanding this is an interim solution.

Cashback farmers voting for cashback to continue.

Couple of whales will decide this anyway.

1 Like

Stefan voted yes so he wants to continue

1 Like

sure, but more important seems his post here: GIP - 127: Should GnosisDAO reimburse liquidity providers in the Balancer EURe/sDAI pool for lost opportunity caused by the issue reported by NolanV? - #15 by StefanGeorge

hopefully it will lead to more in time communication about important topics here.

It’s crucial. GnosisPay must be more transparent and share information publicly because GnosisDAO is covering the costs. The GnosisPay operation costs $8M yearly (GIP-128), and GnosisPay shouldn’t be a black box since the GIP-128 was executed.

Again waiting for last minute to drop a cashback proposal that we all know will be accepted (if no cashback no future for GP) as gno whales can approve it or not…

Even as a person who is profiting from the cashback program, this just feels wrong.

2 Likes

So you got the extension. The extension pool is almost empty, and no new proposal has been posted yet?

What did I miss?