Gnosis Ltd Quarterly Report — Q2 2026


The quarterly report of Gnosis Ltd: strategy, product performance, network health, and marketing overview.


Leadership statement

Q2 was the quarter we put our reasoning in public: the Economic Case series published in June lays out the unit economics and strategic rationale for Chain, Pay, and Gnosis App. Events then tested that reasoning, with a hack, our first major distribution deal, and a hard decision about Gnosis App’s future.

On Gnosis Chain, the defining story is the EEZ. The response since we announced it at EthCC has been overwhelmingly positive, and the core-protocol work merged this quarter brings the contracts close to mainnet, where real experimentation can begin. The EEZ block at DappCon covered the full arc: Martin’s bird’s-eye view, Jordi on real-time proving, Philippe on the Gnosis Chain transition, and Vitalik and I on possible zones in the EEZ. We will bring the GIP on Gnosis Chain’s future to the DAO soon; informal feedback so far is resoundingly pro-EEZ. I look forward to Gnosis Chain hopefully joining the EEZ by the end of the year, initially in a limited capacity, expanding to full support over the following 9 to 12 months.

Gnosis Pay had its hardest week and its best distribution win in the same month. A critical bug in the Zodiac delay module forced a multi-day service halt in early June; over 99% of users were restored within a week, with every affected Safe replaced and re-linked to existing cards, no reissuance needed. Three weeks later the MiniPay Card launched on Celo through Opera’s wallet, putting our card infrastructure in front of 16M+ activated wallets: the B2B thesis working as intended. We build the rails once, and partners bring distribution we could never buy.

On Gnosis App: growth has been linear, and linear is not good enough for a consumer product. With dozens of wallets failing and the mainstream use case yet to materialize, a wallet team needs to be nimble and fully focused on its users, and operating inside an organization of Gnosis’s breadth made that harder. We still believe Circles is a strong hook and differentiator, and Q2 bears that out: active minters more than doubled and 69 builders shipped 74 mini-apps in the Circles Garage. The consequence was a difficult one: we significantly reduced the team, and a focused group will bring a proposal to the DAO to fund Gnosis App independently. Whatever the outcome, Gnosis App will cease to be part of Gnosis Ltd in Q3. These decisions were taken in the first week of July, after the quarter closed, so they are not reflected in the Q2 product sections. I wanted the Gnosis community and token holders to hear this from us now; full details will follow in the coming funding GIPs.

Friederike Ernst, Co-founder

The quarter at a glance

Closed-quarter figures. Q2 2026 ran 1 April to 30 June 2026.

Group KPI Q2 2026 (closed) Q1 2026 QoQ Source
Gnosis Chain — transactions 25,818,351 18,912,820 +36.5% Cerebro
Gnosis Pay — total payments 561,252 563,561 −0.4% Cerebro
Gnosis Pay — payment volume (USD) $26,420,000 $27,390,000 −3.6% Cerebro
Gnosis App — active card users ~800 ~500 +60% CRC Cashback Analytics
Gnosis App — daily active users (last day) 1647 1011 +62% Gnosis Analytics
Gnosis App — weekly active users (last week) 4533 3225 +40% Gnosis Analytics
Circles — registered humans 25,391 15,616 +62.6% Cerebro
Circles — active minters (excl. blacklisted) 8,859 4,165 +112.7% Dune
Circles — total backers 874 655 +33.4% Dune
  • The Fusaka hard fork activated on Gnosis Chain on 14 April 2026, completing a mandatory protocol upgrade with approximately a 6% participation drop and no chain downtime; the next upgrade target is Glamsterdam.
  • Gnosis Pay went multi-chain on 23 June, launching the MiniPay Card on Celo through Opera’s wallet, giving 16M+ activated wallet users the ability to spend stablecoin balances anywhere Visa is accepted across Europe, Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.
  • A critical bug in the Gnosis Pay delay module was disclosed on 1 June; card services were restored for over 99% of users by 6 June, with every affected Safe replaced and re-linked to existing cards without reissuance.
  • The Circles Garage closed on 29 June after six weeks and 69+ builders shipping working mini-apps on the Circles protocol, from a local town economy to interview-practice tools.
  • Circles active minters more than doubled QoQ (+112.7% to 8,859), outpacing the already-strong 62.6% growth in registered humans, indicating that existing participants are engaging more deeply with the protocol.
  • Gnosis App swap volume grew 124.9% QoQ to $702,700, with peak daily swappers reaching 294, a 65.2% increase over Q1, driven in part by the Give & Earn referral programme launched in May.
  • EEZ core-protocol R&D advanced materially in Q2, with cross-chain call hardening, static call support, and rollup-ID registry protections merged into the eez-core-protocol repository.

Product overview

Gnosis App (& Circles)

Closed-quarter figures. Q2 2026 ran 1 April to 30 June 2026.
Gnosis App

KPI Q2 2026 (closed) Q1 2026 QoQ Source
Gnosis App - active card users ~800 ~500 +60% CRC Cashback Analytics
Gnosis App - daily active users 1647 1011 +62% Gnosis Analytics
Gnosis App - weekly active users 4533 3225 +40% Gnosis Analytics

Circles

KPI Q2 2026 (closed) Q1 2026 QoQ Source
Registered humans 25,391 15,616 +62.6% Cerebro
Active minters (excl. blacklisted) 8,859 4,165 +112.7% Dune
Total backers 874 655 +33.4% Dune

Gnosis App

Q2 was spent reshaping the app around the Circles-first approach outlined in the Q1 report, with the neobank under the hood: a full UX overhaul and a set of new features, live now at app.gnosis.io. iOS approval landed after weeks of back and forth with Apple; the App Store release is imminent, with Android to follow.

In parallel, we worked with the marketing team on the foundations for user acquisition across channels: the referral program, organic TikTok, paid Meta ads, and Circles Garage.

Full Q2 metrics for the app are in the numbers section above. In short: growth is real but linear, not exponential yet. Two things slowed the quarter: the restructuring early in Q2, and the June Gnosis Pay service halt that left cards inactive for several days.

Note also that the reshaped app only went live in mid-to-late June, so Q2 numbers mostly reflect the pre-rebuild app; the new version has not yet been brought to market with full acquisition focus.

As mentioned earlier, the app is being spun out of Gnosis Ltd into an independent company to provide the right conditions for its success. Depending on the GIP outcome, from Q3 the app reports to the DAO as a portfolio company rather than a budget line within Gnosis Ltd’s GIP.

Source: Gnosis Analytics

Circles

This quarter Circles continues its deep integration into Gnosis App, with activations at ETHPrague and DappCon 2026 in Berlin in June.

Registered humans reached 25,391 by quarter-end, up 62.6% on Q1’s 15,616. Active minting grew faster still: non-blacklisted active minters, meaning users who create at least 80% of the CRC they are entitled to, reached 8,859, up 112.7% from 4,165. That minters grew almost twice as fast as registrations is the quarter’s clearest sign that new accounts are engaging rather than sitting dormant. Backers, users who invest $100 into their own CRC and the protocol, grew to 874, up 33.4%.

Circles deepened its integration into Gnosis App and featured at ETHPrague and DappCon 2026 in Berlin in June. On the merchant side, a pilot with events platform Dandelion is underway and a second with Amsterdam merchants is about to launch.

The Give & Earn referral programme launched in May, paying €10 in CRC to both referrer and new cardholder on the first qualifying spend. Alongside it, CRC transfers in the app gained on-chain payment notes, a small but useful touch for peer-to-peer use. The mid-June “Economic Case for Gnosis App” forum post set out the consumer thesis publicly: Circles distribution, not swap volume, is the product.

The Circles Garage, a six-week hackathon for mini-apps built on Circles (particularly ones controllable with the Gnosis App passkey), ran from mid-May to a closing ceremony on 29 June. Sixty-nine builders shipped 74 mini-apps, from a local town economy to an interview-practice tool that pays in CRC and a general-purpose wallet toolbox, with a sample live at https://circles.gnosis.io/. It was enabled by a new mini-app framework for building advanced Circles functionality quickly, stronger admin tooling, and “magic links”, mass referral links that community admins share to speed onboarding.

The quarter’s UX overhaul also introduced a reputation score, and a custom group whose group-CRC minting is gated on an off-chain oracle, here the reputation score itself.

Gnosis Pay

Closed-quarter figures. Q2 2026 ran 1 April to 30 June 2026.

KPI Q2 2026 (closed) Q1 2026 QoQ Source
Total payments 561,252 563,561 −0.4% Cerebro
Payment volume (USD) $26,420,000 $27,390,000 −3.6% Cerebro
Peak monthly active users (distorted due to hack) 18,744 9,289 +101.8% Cerebro
Cashback paid (USD) $262,000 $297,400 −11.9% Cerebro

The quarter split into two halves. May was the high point, with 218,573 payments and $10.13M in volume. A critical bug in the Zodiac delay module was disclosed on 1 June. Card services were suspended, then progressively restored through the week of 4 June. Every affected Safe was replaced and re-linked to existing physical and virtual cards, with no new card issuance required. The team responded quickly, communicated openly, and owned the incident, which brought support from users. Weekly active users fell to a low of 3,129 during the outage week before recovering to 4,805 by 29 June. The incident was impactful, but the response limited the long-term damage. Volume held up better than the outage suggests: we retained roughly 80% of volume through the incident, and usage returned to median levels by the end of June.

Source: Gnosis Analytics

B2B2C GTM: Minipay Launch

The quarter’s most significant distribution event arrived on 23 June: Gnosis Pay went live on Celo, but more importantly it is powering the MiniPay Card for Opera’s MiniPay wallet. MiniPay has 16M+ activated wallets. Eligible users can add the card to Apple Pay or Google Pay and spend stablecoin balances anywhere Visa is accepted. The card is issued through Monavate; settlement to Visa happens in real time with local-currency conversion at the merchant end. The launch also extends Pay’s card infrastructure to a second chain.

The rollout is going live in phases across Africa, the EU, Latin America, and Asia, with KYC flows being optimised for each new jurisdiction in phases.

Gnosis Pay v2

Gnosis Pay v2 is an enterprise product built for fintechs like MiniPay. It improves on v1 across customer experience, privacy, and the operational controls enterprises expect. Withdrawals are now instant as the three-minute delay module from v1 is gone, so users can move funds back to their own address straight away. Privacy is stronger, because transactions are aggregated into a single daily settlement rather than posted one by one. v2 also works with gas stations, which v1 did not. It ships with the alarms and escalation paths enterprise partners need for security and compliance. The team is finalising multi-tenancy now and expects to start onboarding partners onto v2 at the end of August, with a migration from v1 to follow.

Gnosis Chain

Closed-quarter figures. Q2 2026 ran 1 April to 30 June 2026.

Network KPI Q2 2026 (closed) Q1 2026 QoQ Source
Transactions (quarter) 25,818,351 18,912,820 +36.5% Cerebro
Staked GNO 334,900 368,400 −9.1% Cerebro

Gnosis Chain processed 25,818,351 transactions in Q2, up 36.5% from Q1. June alone contributed 8,911,769 transactions, up 6.2% month-over-month, continuing a consistent upward trend through the quarter. Staked GNO fell 9.1% to 334,900, a movement worth monitoring across subsequent quarters.

The Fusaka hard fork activated on 14 April at epoch 1,714,688. Validator participation dropped approximately 6% at activation, with operators who had not yet updated falling out of sync. This is considered healthy. A post-mortem for the DAppNode-specific issues was published to the chain specs repository alongside the Balancer incident post-mortem filed earlier in the quarter. The next named upgrade target is Glamsterdam.

Stablecoins on Gnosis Chain

Seven new fiat-backed stablecoins were added to Gnosis Chain:

  • Six Latin American stablecoins from Ripio: wARS, wBRL, wMXN, wCOP, wCLP, and wPEN, each backed 1:1 by local currency reserves. They are live but not yet traded. We will deploy initial liquidity and scale it as use cases roll out, several of which are already planned.
  • tGBP, a British pound stablecoin issued by an FCA-registered firm, backed 1:1 with GBP. Fiat on/off ramps are in place, and yield incentives for tGBP holders are planned.

Closed-quarter figures. Q2 2026 ran 1 April to 30 June 2026.

Stablecoin Peg Median daily supply (USD) Quarter-end supply (USD) Median daily holders Transfer volume Q2 (USD) Contract
WxDAI USD $78,974,661 $68,936,777 46,863 $612,895,234 0xe91d…a97d
sDAI USD $75,018,745 $66,251,019 28,173 $838,894,772 0xaf20…3701
EURe EUR $22,340,744 $21,740,754 35,509 $576,943,424 0x420c…3430
USDC USD $18,206,153 $18,232,590 83,890 $199,289,077 0xddaf…7a83
USDC.e USD $13,221,475 $13,496,485 22,994 $381,633,500 0x2a22…76f0
ZCHF CHF $1,102,944 $992,023 193 $8,520,011 0xd4dd…5553
USDT USD $995,558 $755,947 29,693 $37,119,133 0x4eca…05c6
GBPe GBP $720,434 $540,731 1,143 $9,796,342 0x8e34…7053
svZCHF CHF $645,438 $466,765 329 $3,438,271 0x6165…4fe9
BRLA BRL $431,242 $468,233 10,580 $6,116,525 0xfecb…3760
Total $211,657,394 $191,881,324 $2,674,646,289

Ethereum Economic Zone (R&D contribution)

The Ethereum Economic Zone is co-developed with ZisK and co-funded by the Ethereum Foundation. Its aim is synchronous composability across Ethereum and compatible rollups: the ability to transact across chains as though they shared a single execution environment, without waiting for asynchronous message passing.

During Q2, the eez-core-protocol repository saw material advances in the core protocol contracts. Cross-chain call hardening tightened rollup registration to a one-shot process, preventing re-registration attacks, and bound inbound cross-chain calls to registered entry points with explicit validation. Static cross-chain calls via STATICCALL were added alongside stronger proxy protection, which binds calls to rollups through destination validation — a meaningful step toward production-grade composability. A deferred revert mechanism was also merged, allowing cross-chain execution failures to propagate deferred rather than immediately, improving how composable contracts handle error conditions across chains.

Marketing

Strategic summary

Our focus for the quarter was to support user acquisition and message testing for Gnosis App and to activate the brands at EthCC and later at Dappcon. We also managed communications around the exploit involving the delay module on Gnosis Pay and supported the launch of the MiniPay card.

Specific highlights include a solid improvements on cost-per-acquisition (CPA) for paid media for the consumer app, as we honed in on refined messaging and began to increase spend accordingly. We embedded AI across the marketing and comms function and saw this impact particularly our short form video (SFV) output and social media content improving our posting cadence while guarding quality. We continued to improve metrics and monitoring across the board. Our social presence outside of X grew, with multiple content pieces breaking the first 10k threshold on TikTok and solid performance particularly in YouTube.

We also improved transparency with the community by adding ecosystem sessions to our regular AMAs, and improving DAO documentation and forum UX.

In Q3 we will accelerate our progress in SEO / GEO, having implemented strong fundamentals this quarter and seeing solid initial performance. The focus for this will be Gnosis Pay where high quality content can support the generation of marketing-qualified-leads (MQL) and help put us in the consideration set for larger wallets and FinTechs.

Specific Activations this Quarter

Campaign Brand(s) covered Activation type Q-window timing Headline outcome
Cannes - Gnosis Dinner, ethCC & WalletCon Gnosis App, Gnosis Pay, Gnosis Chain Event Early April 2026 Gnosis Pay team presented stablecoin and blockchain iteration framing to fintech audience
Give & Earn Season Gnosis Pay, Circles, Gnosis App Referral May 2026 New card holders earning €10 CRC reward on first €10 spend; drove Gnosis App peak daily swappers to 294 (+65.2% QoQ)
Gnosis Ecosystem Sessions Multi-brand Event June 2026 (recurring) Recurring Discord community call; June session featured Safe, Nethermind, and Bread Co-operative updates
Dappcon 2026 Gnosis Chain, EEZ Event 16–17 June 2026, Berlin Speaker programme and ticket sales live; Gnosis-ecosystem speakers confirmed across execution controls, read privacy, and DeFi mortgages tracks
MiniPay Card launch Gnosis Pay BD Late June 2026 Gnosis Pay powers MiniPay Card for Opera’s 16M+ activated-wallet base; eligible users can add to Apple Pay or Google Pay

About this report’s contents

This report covers Q2 2026 (1 April – 30 June 2026). All figures are drawn from the Gnosis Analytics (Cerebro) and Dune Analytics data pipelines and are management estimates, not audited accounts. All changes are quarter-over-quarter (QoQ) unless otherwise marked. Full metric definitions, sources, and known caveats are held in a Data reference appendix by Gnosis Ltd.

4 Likes

Instead of asking for another $3M to fund independent spin-offs, let’s talk about stopping the actual bloodbath.

The Q2 2026 report strips away the marketing narratives and leaves us with brutal mathematical realities. The infrastructure is bleeding millions, the consumer traction is artificially manufactured by cashback subsidies, and the core business units are completely stagnant.

If this DAO is going to preserve long-term value for GNO holders, we need to stop playing relationship-management games and get direct answers to four operational questions:

  • What is the exact headcount and payroll being eliminated?
    You note that you have “significantly reduced the team” for Gnosis App. We don’t need vague qualitative descriptions. What was the exact burn rate before, what is it now, and how many non-technical, corporate-overhead roles are being permanently removed from the DAO’s balance sheet?

  • Why are we subsidizing dead-on-arrival vanity products?
    The report highlights the addition of seven new fiat-backed stablecoins, while quietly admitting that they are live but not yet traded and that the DAO will have to deploy initial liquidity to prop them up. Why are we risking treasury assets to subsidize the appearance of transaction volume for partnerships with zero organic demand?

  • What is the concrete plan to bridge the 70x–100x chain deficit?
    Gnosis Chain is the only foundationally valuable asset we have, yet it collected a trivial $105,000 in fees over the last 12 months against a massive $7M–$10M annual operational burn. If the proposed Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) transition is the solution, we need hard, modeled numbers. How exactly does a centralized sequencer and fast block times organically attract developers without the DAO having to constantly pay multi-million dollar deployment bribes?

  • What are you shutting down entirely?
    Gnosis Pay volume dropped 3.6% and total payments dropped 0.4% quarter-over-quarter. The B2C consumer acquisition play has objectively failed. Instead of restructuring these business lines into independent shell companies to shield them from accountability, why aren’t we completely shutting down the failed consumer experiments, open-sourcing the IP, and focusing 100% of our remaining capital on foundational, self-sustaining network utility?

Sunk cost fallacy is a choice. To cut off the finger is too late, it’s time to cut off the whole arm before it drags the entire treasury under.

1 Like

@citrullin

What is the exact headcount and payroll being eliminated?

The App and Circles teams went from 28 to 14. The associated burn reduction and the per-team cost breakdown belong in a financial accounts report rather than in a product and KPI document, but there will be information on financials added to this report. Although I do not think specifics on ‘burn reduction’ will be provided.

Why are we subsidizing dead-on-arrival vanity products?

Contracts going live before they trade is standard, as is seeding liquidity. Any DAO capital deployed falls under the treasury manager’s mandate and their risk assessment rather than a product decision. On demand, several non-USD stablecoins are showing real traction and it’s a category Gnosis Chain has been deliberately pursuing, so “zero organic demand” is inaccurate, and I disagree that stablecoins are ‘dead on arrival vanity products’ but thank you for sharing your opinion. At the moment Gnosis Chain is one of the leading non-USD ecosystems with global currencies also offering benefits to the app layer.

What is the concrete plan to bridge the 70x–100x chain deficit?

Reducing that burn is the starting point. The detail belongs in the forthcoming Gnosis Chain GIP covering how the chain intends to use the EEZ framework, including the case for why it attracts builders. We won’t publish modelled fee figures before the EEZ protocol is in mainnet production, because anything provided would be pulled from thin air. Again, this report is a retrospective overview of the last quarter.

What are you shutting down entirely? The B2C consumer acquisition play has objectively failed

Gnosis Pay runs a B2B2C strategy, communicated for months (there is a section specifically called B2B2C GTM). Volume held roughly steady while incentives were reduced, which is the more informative read than the headline QoQ move, and the last two quarters engineering went into v2 and the MiniPay launch across 16M+ activated wallets. If your argument is that B2C acquisition hasn’t carried its cost, that’s a fair argument and it’s close to the reasoning behind spinning out the App.


On the framing:

The infrastructure is bleeding millions, the consumer traction is artificially manufactured by cashback subsidies, and the core business units are completely stagnant.

Lets be clear about what you’re doing here. You are not auditing this report, you are prosecuting it. An audit follows the numbers to a conclusion. A prosecution starts at the conclusion and recruits numbers toward it, which is why your post opens with a verdict and arrives at the questions afterwards.

As you’ve taken it upon yourself to do this across all posters, the cost is that your meaningful points are getting harder to find underneath the rhetoric, which is a shame, and every time you frame a question as an accusation you make it easier for people to dismiss the substance along with the tone.

Gnosis Ltd will always answer questions. We are building in the open. That offer does not expire. Gnosis Ltd is also responsible for maintaining community tools that are often used within governance (Discord, Discourse), so forth. We can’t accept ongoing insinuation about motives from anybody that posts on this forum as a substitute for analysis and discussion, in this thread or the next one. The forum needs to stay usable for everyone who wants to participate in governance or build here, including the people you disagree with. Please do consider this.

4 Likes

Thanks for this. I really appreciate the transparency!

Q2 closed the GIP-128 period (July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026). Will the financials being added include the full-year statement: total disbursed, total spent by category, and treatment of the surplus? I believe published actuals through Q1 total $17.7M against up to $30M disbursed.

Q3, Q4, and Q1 spend reports each broke product development out by team, with a dedicated Gnosis Pay page. Will Q2 follow the same format?

The funded period ended June 30 and no renewal GIP is posted. Is there interim funding, and will the renewal proposal come before or after the full-year actuals? GIP-128 said future funding depends on DAO review of outcomes.

What was the total loss from the delay-module exploit, which entity absorbed it, and where will incident costs (reimbursements, audits, legal, etc.) appear in Q2 spend?

The Q2 report says the App will report to the DAO “as a portfolio company rather than a budget line.” Unfortunately, that seems to be a way to completely bury an entity within Gnosis Ltd, as there is almost no reporting on portfolio companies. Most of my concerns on the lack of consistency and quality in Gnosis VC reporting are addressed in the recent quarterly Fund I report, so I won’t repeat them here.

Thanks again!

2 Likes

Q2 closed the GIP-128 period (July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026). Will the financials being added include the full-year statement: total disbursed, total spent by category, and treatment of the surplus? I believe published actuals through Q1 total $17.7M against up to $30M disbursed.

The financials report will be similar to the previous quarter end overviews, and I believe there are plans to do some end of year reconciliation. On surplus, that’s a fair question: GIP-128 didn’t outline a process for it. It may be addressed in a future funding proposal, and I’d expect it to be communicated clearly either way.

Q3, Q4, and Q1 spend reports each broke product development out by team, with a dedicated Gnosis Pay page. Will Q2 follow the same format?

I imagine it will be and I’ll pass on the request to keep it per-team.

The funded period ended June 30 and no renewal GIP is posted. Is there interim funding, and will the renewal proposal come before or after the full-year actuals? GIP-128 said future funding depends on DAO review of outcomes.

There’s no interim funding. I’m not certain on sequencing, but it’s likely the funding proposal is shared ahead of the full financial report.

What was the total loss from the delay-module exploit, which entity absorbed it, and where will incident costs (reimbursements, audits, legal, etc.) appear in Q2 spend?

The final figure is still being confirmed while the post-mortem is underway, so I don’t want to put a number on it yet, but it’ll be shared once settled. My understanding is it sits with Gnosis Ltds.

The Q2 report says the App will report to the DAO “as a portfolio company rather than a budget line.” Unfortunately, that seems to be a way to completely bury an entity within Gnosis Ltd, as there is almost no reporting on portfolio companies. Most of my concerns on the lack of consistency and quality in Gnosis VC reporting are addressed in the recent quarterly Fund I report, so I won’t repeat them here.

I’m not fully confident I understand what you mean by completely bury an entity. I’d actually read it the other way around. The App isn’t being folded into Gnosis Ltd, it’s being spun out into an independent company and will cease to be part of Gnosis Ltd in Q3. Essentially Gnosis App is going to seek strategic advice from Gnosis Ltd and opposed to being within detailed budget lines. Yea, I can’t speak for Gnosis VC, they are a separate operating entity.

Hope that answers.

1 Like

The App, if funding is approved, will become an independent entity, but the DAO will own a percentage of that entity, correct? And it will be included in the Gnosis VC portfolio, along with 60-70 other entities in which the DAO owns equity, correct?

My concern is that there is very little info on any investments the DAO has made. So this new App entity will likely become another name on that long list, where we have little or no info moving forward. Everything seems so passive to me, right? We release 4M USD to this entity, shouldn’t we expect at least quarterly updates?

Just go through the page above and you’ll notice some of those organizations are no longer active, for example. I’m not aware of any reporting at all on any of these entities, outside of the Fund I reports which have appeared sporadically. And they contain very little info, and only on new investments (Fund I investments).

I suppose I’m surprised we’re not actively managing all of those investments. Or, if we are, there is no info about our activities, no reporting, no valuation, etc. Or if there is, I’m just now aware of it.

Am I wrong? Are my expectations too high (seriously)? The DAO has stakes (equity) in those entities, they are all listed on the webpage as part of Gnosis VC, should the DAO expect more info on what is happening? When they shut down or cease operations, should they be removed from the website? I would expect a public company would report quarterly on these types of investments, no?

2 Likes