Is the integration of Ethena in Spark a risk for DAI and sDAI on Gnosis?

Does anyone more knowledgeable than me know if the integration of Ethena into Spark has direct or indirect implications for DAI (and sDAI) on Gnosis? Personally, I don’t think Ethena is trustworthy (overall too many risk vectors and not battle-tested in a bearmarket) and the increased weaving of Ethena into a Maker (Sky) product doesn’t sit well with me at first glance.

There also seems to be a conflict of interest with the Spark founder.

Source:
https://x.com/leptokurtic_/status/1879201959003214125

3 Likes

+1 from me, would be great if someone can provide some in-depth thoughts on this.

My high level view is that it makes DAI/USDS less robust overall, but helps to maintain an attractive sDAI/sUSDS rate over a full cycle (long term average of ETH/BTC funding rate is 10-15% across major exchanges), as the current savings rate leads to Maker/Sky running at a deficit.

In addition to the USDe risk itself, they’re also adding duration risk and third party protocol risk (Pendle) by buying PT tokens expiring in May…

2 Likes