Proposal: GIP-134: Pilot a Gnosis Growth Fund for small scale, community-led ecosystem funding (Re-Do)
Voted: Abstain
Rationale: As voiced earlier regarding redo votes on Snapshot regardless of failure to reach quorum or failing to pass with a majority of against votes, I do not think redo proposals should be encouraged. Especially in the case of failure to reach quorum, a discussion that can hopefully result in a clear solution is vital for the health of the DAO. Hence, despite I love the idea behind Gardens, seeing it as an important experiment for Gnosis DAO, and having voted for the initial proposal, I abstain from voting in the redo, sadly.
Proposal: GIP-136: Should GnosisDAO support maintenance of the Gnosis Explorer (v1 + v2)?
Voted: Against
Rationale:
As it is specified clearly in the Governance Tutorial article,
Therefore, due to the forum poll ending with a majority result with make no changes, this proposal fails to fulfill the requirement for moving to Phase 3, aka. Snapshot. The clear solution here is to amend the proposal based on feedback and go through another forum poll. Only in case the forum poll enables the proposal to move to the final phase, it can be posted on Snapshot.
On the other hand, I am very well aware that in the Governance Process article, this requirement is simply reduced to a suggestion. However, I prefer to follow best practices.