I think it would be very benefitial to mention why it is needed in the interface. E.g. what would be the benefit of this compared to having a specific Safe app that uses the module add it.
Yes, it is reasonable to add modules by means of specific safe apps. I will consider this variant (considering and evaluating this variant it is a part of my work under this proposal).
So this fact does not contradict to my proposal, it is just one of the variants to make my proposal work.
As you propose to write multiple interfaces I would recommend to split them into smaller proposals that could each be a GECO grant. Having one big collection issue that includes everything makes it very unlikely to be accepted.
I will consider this.
It is beneficial for the DAO to accept it as a wholesale: the price may be smaller, the doer does it in an unified way without incompatibilities and inconsistencies of different parts, I learn to do it once rather than repeated learning by several persons.
What are the exact reason that it could not be accepted? I just don’t understand why.
Can other forum members comment on whether it is unlikely to be accepted? If it is really so, I can start making GECO grants now, but otherwise I would first wait: what if my proposal indeed will be accepted? This would simplify things.
We do not plan to audit these modules. Actually we might remove them altogether. Modules that are used are in the safe-modules repository.
To be honest, removing any one of these 4 modules would be stupid because every one of them is very useful. I advise to change those plans and make also the auditing proposal or grant (not by me).
However, it would probably be reasonable to move these 4 modules to
safe-modules repo. It does not in any way influence my proposal.
The current proposal is very general, without a lot information. For the amount of GNO requested I am missing quite some info, that is why I am mentioning it.
I think, you are right on this. So, please explain me which details you need. Certainly, I want to make the UI of good UX for humans. If I missed the phrase “make the UI of good UX for humans” - it is here now.
Also one last question: Did you try to apply for a GECO grant with this proposal?
I didn’t. Exactly for the reason that it’s big.
Oh, I misread or misremembered it (So, ignore the things I wrote above that contradict to this.): Now I see I can apply for a >$3000 GECO grants. Certainly I will. Just advise please on how many grants to make (and about your proposed removing of modules).