Transparency of Gnosis DAO treasury & VC investments

Hi Gnosis Community!

I am writing on behalf of Thanefield Capital, a prop trading firm specializing in both quantitative and thesis-driven strategies. As holders of GNO, we think that Gnosis DAO does a great job at creating value. We appreciate the strategic thinking and synergies being developed between Gnosis Chain, Gnosis Pay, a substantial treasury professionally managed by @Karpatkey, DAO’s VC portfolio, and spun-off projects. However, we’d like to initiate a conversation about the transparency of Gnosis DAO’s treasury management. Despite significant efforts by Karpatkey to enhance transparency, we believe that more can be done.

In recent months, we have observed Karpatkey executing GNO buybacks through TWAP orders, limit orders, and OTC transactions. Separately, @mkoeppelmann has proposed using high-ROI venture deals for the buyback of GNO, and thanks to Karpatkey for keeping us updated on this initiative. We are strongly in favor of returning value to GNO token holders, especially now, as GNO appears to be trading below its book value when considering the illiquid assets. In our view, increased transparency of the DAO’s holdings is another considerable value driver that will benefit all stakeholders of Gnosis DAO. We’ve seen interest from other parties in this issue, for instance, some of our concerns mirror some of the questions raised earlier by @gno-investor.

Gnosis DAO wallets

In its reports, Karpatkey lists only two wallets, from which active treasury management is conducted – one on the Ethereum mainnet and one on the Gnosis Chain. However, in this forum post, Karpatkey requests delegation of Gnosis DAO’s GEL and vCOW, located on the following wallets: wallet 1 (GEL), wallet 2 (vCOW). The vCOW holdings were acquired as a result of the spinoff of the CoW protocol, but we have absolutely no information about GEL and wouldn’t have known about the DAO holding it if it weren’t for this forum post. This naturally raises questions:

  1. Do these wallets belong to Gnosis DAO?

  2. Are they managed by Karpatkey?

  3. If so, why are they not included in Karpatkey’s reports?

  4. What is the comprehensive list of wallets that hold Gnosis DAO’s assets?

VC investments

There is very little transparency on the investments made over the years on behalf Gnosis DAO. Karpatkey promised us “a comprehensive document” three months ago, yet we have seen no follow-up.

As we know, in-house Factor VC was established as a result of GIP 38. Two days ago it started transferring funds to the Gnosis DAO’s wallet managed by Karpatkey, which we believe is part of the winding-down process. We understand that the process takes time and that a complete and precise breakdown of investments might not be available until its completion. However, it would be helpful for the community to know what’s the timeline and what’s the status of this process.

In addition, there have been several investments not made through Factor but directly by the DAO itself. Gelato, as previously mentioned, appears to be one of these cases. Furthermore, from multiple sources, we have identified the following investments made on behalf of Gnosis, not through Factor:

  • Zerion
  • IDEX
  • Gearbox
  • RabbitHole
  • Coinshift
  • MatterLabs
  • Monerium
  • Snapshot Labs

Additionally, @mkoeppelmann mentioned DAO’s possession of TICK in his recent blog post. We don’t know what TICK is and where it’s held.

We would appreciate more detailed information about these and any other investments that we may not have discovered.

8 Likes

Hey - high level answer

There are 3 categories of investments.

  1. TheDAO did directly. Those will always have a public GIP and are set up in way that the DAO has directly control over it.
    This was for example the case with Tick: GIP-18: Should GnosisDAO invest at TickDAO?

  2. Indirect via Factor
    Here did the DAO decide to allocate funds that factor deployed. The deployment process of factor is over and it has started to return liquid assets to the DAO - I expect a report from Factor soon(ish) with a full list of investments.

  3. Investments of Gnosis Ltd.
    Ltd. is a company that is not controlled or owned by the DAO but that as well has the goal to advance the Gnosis ecosystem. This company made also various investments. Sometimes it decides to hand over returns of investments to the DAO - but it has no obligation to do so and the DAO should not consider owning any of those investments until it is explicitly handed over.
    If I recall correctly Gelato was such a case where the investment was done via the Ltd. but the Ltd. decided to grant resulting tokens to the DAO.

7 Likes

Thanks for your reply.

Regarding the first category, there seems to be little uncertainty – it primarily includes TickDAO, which does not appear to be actively developed at this time.

Concerning the investments managed by Factor, could a representative from the Factor team provide an update on the ongoing process and let us know when we can expect the report?

As for Ltd to DAO transfers, this is where the need for more transparency becomes evident. If Gnosis DAO was handed over assets, such as GEL, the DAO should be informed about these holdings. Currently, there is no publicly available information about any transfers from Ltd to the DAO. Could we request that Karpatkey begin including these assets in their future reports?

Again, we feel transparency on this matter will benefit all stakeholders of Gnosis DAO.

6 Likes

Transparency… many early investors (STAKE/xDai) lost their funds during the swap to GNO, since the swap contract was close-ended, when it didn’t have to be. Any discussion regarding this scam is ignored. That’s the transparency you’ll get from this community.

1 Like

The following members offered “help” with nearly the same message and random links:

Can anyone let me know if these members are actually able to help?

1 Like

Hi @stakegno - Gnosis team members will never DM on the forum or any of our channels. I’ve suspended these users.

In terms of the STAKE/GNO swap - please search the topic on the forum, the Gnosis Chain Discord and on Twitter. You’ll notice that the deadline to swap was communicated consistently leading up to the swap, during the swap and as we approached the deadline.

1 Like