vGNO holders should be allocated $safe token as it falls in the category of locked gno contract


snapshot: Snapshot
details: Should GnosisDAO respond to the Hundred Finance exploit in the following manner?

1 Like

Afaik vGNO haven’t been locked voluntarily by the holders but due to an agreement helping hundred finance to reimburse it’s users losses.

IMO that is something quite different compared to ppl. locking the funds they could also have sold. I don’t mind to include these if majority opinion will vote for, but personally I will abstain if there are no more arguments as the cited links.

Since vGNO can even be sold in open market through otc(or even liquidating vGNO by borrowing against it), hence it can be considered a voluntary hold of locked GNO by vGNO holders.

I’m sure you’re away but GIP-64 just passed quorum Snapshot

just looked where to get it (would be glad if it would be available with some discount) but can’t find any place.

you can ask people here for an offer Discord